Use Vivid Description What is good writing? Even though the correct answer is that whether a piece of writing is good or not rests entirely with the reader, many people think that good writing is effective writing. Good writing follows a flow. Good writing is focused.
Janet In certain disciplines of science, passive voice is used to avoid overusing or using at all we or I. This is not the same thing as the passive voice being the expected style; you can often avoid using we and still use the active voice, and you should do so except if the passive voice is preferable for other reasons.
You are still likely to end up with writing that uses the passive voice more often than would be ideal. The first three points are valid and important, I think; the fourth strikes me as being irrelevant at best. The crucial common element embedded in the first three defenses is the author's conscious and well-conceived decision to use passive voice.
In my experience, such intentionality is rare. More often, an author falls into passive voice unwittingly and repeatedly in situations where doing so does nothing to supply a desirable emphasis or to promote structural variety. The latter is a bit shorter than the former, and avoids relegating the actor in active voice vs passive voice business writing sentence the FBI's Washington Field Office to a participial phrase; the result to my ear sounds crisper and cleaner.
But this is all a matter of taste, I suppose, since the sentence does eventually identify the actor and attribute the action to that actor.
The worst fault of passive voice is that all too often it serves to deliver action without an actor.
One could argue that Reagan chose this wording because he wanted to emphasize the politically fraught concession implied by the word "mistakes"; but the formulation also has the convenient characteristic of failing to identify a source of the mistakes: The sentence identifies a result and an action, but no actor in the non—Ronald Reagan sense of the word.
Though Reagan's formulation surely represents a thoughtful and tactical use of passive voice, many instances of actorless sentences do not. Consider this extended exercise in passivity: When the cost of proposals is born by the business side of the house, frivolous proposals are stopped, proposals are better prioritized, and what is proposed is more likely to have a true ROI to the business, reducing waste and abandoned projects.
The first passive-voice element "is born" has an identified actor "the business side of the house"but the next three "are stopped," "are prioritized," and "is proposed" do not. A reader slogging through this sentence must either struggle to identify the unnamed actors the allocation of cost to the business side "stops" frivolous proposals, the receivers of proposals [presumably managers] "prioritize" them, and the makers of proposals [presumably lower-level staffers] "propose" them or—as is much more likely—skate over the surface of the sentence without really comprehending it.
The following reformulation of the sentence is far likelier to make sense to a reader: Requiring the business side of the house to bear the cost of proposals discourages staffers from submitting frivolous proposals, encourages managers to give priority to the most promising suggestions, and increases the likelihood that proposals will offer a legitimate return on investment, thereby reducing waste and lowering the incidence of abandoned projects.
The revised sentence is significantly longer than the original, but that's a price I'm willing to pay if it yields a sentence that identifies who is doing what, rather than leaving that task to each reader.
Finally, actorless passive voice often crops up in situations where the unnamed actor responsible for the action in a sentence is in fact the author. In these instances, obscuring the author as the source of the action promotes a sense of the objective truth of the assertion. The company simply "could not be contacted.Do You Need a Passive Voice Checker?
Most writing will expect you to use the “active voice” rather than “passive voice”. Usually, when we discuss something, the thing or person taking the action will come first followed by the verb and then the thing that is acted upon.
A collection of ESL, EFL downloadable, printable worksheets, practice exercises and activities to teach about passive voice or active voice. Learn the differents between active voice and passive voice with examples.
what is active voice and passive voice explain with examples, identify the type of passive voice, without by passive voice in english sentences.
Then, we started talking about the second usage of werden – a helper verb for the future tense. And that’s where we’ll pick up today. And first we’ll explore how and why werden became the German counterpart of will..
Why “werden” and “will” express future. Today's topic is active voice versus passive voice.
Here's a question from Brian in Iowa. He writes, “It drives me crazy when people write in passive voice. You really don’t know academic writing if you think we can get away with using the passive voice.
Good writing doesn’t use it, be it academic or otherwise.